Before the conference, the closest I had been to the subject of tracking was that of a TV show.
I know what tracking is: the determination of whether or not someone or something has been in a particular location and, if they have been, in what direction they went.
Beyond that, I knew nothing.
After the Introduction to Tracking class, taught by Rob Speiden, I can say I know just a little bit more.
We examined shoe prints in easily impressionable sand.
We measured and diagrammed the prints, measured stride, and learned how to properly document a track.
All-in-all, it was a great class.
Tracking Evaluations
While at the conference I had the opportunity to take two tracking evaluations: sign interpretations and sign squares.
These evaluations, along with several others, are required for becoming a certified tracker.
To say I did well would be an overstatement.
I knew some of the sign interpretation questions but had never been exposed to any of the sign squares which requires the student to determine whether there are zero, one, or two tracks in each square, where the track starts and ends, and in what direction the track goes.
I did better than I expected, having never been exposed to the problem, and found myself learning more about what to look for when looking for tracks.
The scores I received were a 3.27 on the Sign Interpretation, and a 2.22 on Detection and a 3.75 in the Interpretation on the Sign Squares test.
Needless to say, I’m not a tracker… yet.
Overall, I found the conference to be a great way to learn new skills and to meet new people.
I’ve even been invited to attend the NPS SAREX in a couple of weeks so we’ll have to see how that goes.